AJCN Yamada Bee Farm Grant for Honeybee Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr 90: 106-115, 2009. First published May 27, 2009; doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27474
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27474
Vol. 90, No. 1, 106-115, July 2009

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/106    most recent
ajcn.2009.27474v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koopman, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Loon, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koopman, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Loon, L. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koopman, R.
Right arrow Articles by van Loon, L. J.
© 2009 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

ORIGINAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate is accompanied by an accelerated in vivo digestion and absorption rate when compared with its intact protein1,2,3

René Koopman, Nico Crombach, Annemie P Gijsen, Stéphane Walrand, Jacques Fauquant, Arie K Kies, Sophie Lemosquet, Wim HM Saris, Yves Boirie and Luc JC van Loon

1 From the Department of Human Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands (RK, NC, and LJCvL); the Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands (APG and WHMS); the Human Nutrition Unit, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine BP 321, Clermont-Ferrand, France (SW and YB); INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1253, Rennes, France (JF); DSM Food Specialties, Research and Development, Biochemistry and Nutrition Department, Delft, Netherlands (AKK); Unité Mixte de Recherches sur la Production du Lait, INRA, Saint Gilles, France (SL); and Top Institute Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, Netherlands (LJCvL).

2 Supported by a grant from DSM Food Specialties (Delft, Netherlands).

3 Address correspondence to LJC van Loon, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. E-mail: l.vanloon{at}hb.unimaas.nl.

Background: It has been suggested that a protein hydrolysate, as opposed to its intact protein, is more easily digested and absorbed from the gut, which results in greater plasma amino acid availability and a greater muscle protein synthetic response.

Objective: We aimed to compare dietary protein digestion and absorption kinetics and the subsequent muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of a single bolus of protein hydrolysate compared with its intact protein in vivo in humans.

Design: Ten elderly men (mean ± SEM age: 64 ± 1 y) were randomly assigned to a crossover experiment that involved 2 treatments in which the subjects consumed a 35-g bolus of specifically produced L-[1-13C]phenylalanine-labeled intact casein (CAS) or hydrolyzed casein (CASH). Blood and muscle-tissue samples were collected to assess the appearance rate of dietary protein–derived phenylalanine in the circulation and subsequent muscle protein fractional synthetic rate over a 6-h postprandial period.

Results: The mean (±SEM) exogenous phenylalanine appearance rate was 27 ± 6% higher after ingestion of CASH than after ingestion of CAS (P < 0.001). Splanchnic extraction was significantly lower in CASH compared with CAS treatment (P < 0.01). Plasma amino acid concentrations increased to a greater extent (25–50%) after the ingestion of CASH than after the ingestion of CAS (P < 0.01). Muscle protein synthesis rates averaged 0.054 ± 0.004% and 0.068 ± 0.006%/h in the CAS and CASH treatments, respectively (P = 0.10).

Conclusions: Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate, as opposed to its intact protein, accelerates protein digestion and absorption from the gut, augments postprandial amino acid availability, and tends to increase the incorporation rate of dietary amino acids into skeletal muscle protein.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
L. J. C. van Loon, Y. Boirie, A. P. Gijsen, J. Fauquant, A. L. de Roos, A. K. Kies, S. Lemosquet, W. H. M. Saris, and R. Koopman
The production of intrinsically labeled milk protein provides a functional tool for human nutrition research
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 4812 - 4822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. Koopman, S. Walrand, M. Beelen, A. P. Gijsen, A. K. Kies, Y. Boirie, W. H. M. Saris, and L. J. C. van Loon
Dietary Protein Digestion and Absorption Rates and the Subsequent Postprandial Muscle Protein Synthetic Response Do Not Differ between Young and Elderly Men
J. Nutr., September 1, 2009; 139(9): 1707 - 1713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society for Nutrition