AJCN EB Program 2010 Early Registration
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Clin Nutr (December 3, 2008). doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.26722
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
89/1/347    most recent
ajcn.2008.26722v1
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by George, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Subar, A. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by George, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Subar, A. F
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by George, S. M
Right arrow Articles by Subar, A. F
© 2008 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Nutritional epidemiology and public health

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cancer: a prospective cohort study1,2,3,4

Stephanie M George, Yikyung Park, Michael F Leitzmann, Neal D Freedman, Emily C Dowling, Jill Reedy, Arthur Schatzkin, Albert Hollenbeck and Amy F Subar

1 From the Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (SMG); the Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (YP, NDF, and AS); the Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany (MFL); the Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (ECD, JR, and AFS); and AARP, Washington, DC (AH).

2 The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the contractor or the Department of Health. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions.

3 Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

4 Address reprint requests and correspondence to A Subar, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7344, EPN 4005, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344. E-mail: subara{at}mail.nih.gov.

ABSTRACT

Background: There is probable evidence that some types of fruit and vegetables provide protection against many cancers.

Objective: We hypothesized that fruit and vegetable intakes are inversely related to the incidence of total cancers among women and men aged >50 y.

Design: We performed a prospective study among the cohort of the National Institutes of Health–AARP Diet and Health Study. We merged the MyPyramid Equivalents Database (version 1.0) with food-frequency-questionnaire data to calculate cup equivalents for fruit and vegetables. From 1995 to 2003, we identified 15,792 and 35,071 cancer cases in 195,229 women and 288,109 men, respectively. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate multivariate relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs associated with the highest compared with the lowest quintile (Q) of fruit and vegetable intakes.

Results: Fruit intake was not associated with the risk of total cancer among women (RRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.05; P trend = 0.059) or men (RRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.02; P for trend = 0.17). Vegetable intake was not associated with risk of total cancer among women (RRQ5 vs Q1 = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.09; P for trend = 0.084), but was associated with a significant decrease in risk in men (RRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91, 0.97; P trend = 0.004). This significant finding among men was no longer evident when we limited the analysis to men who never smoked (RRQ5 vs Q1 = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.04; P for trend = 0.474).

Conclusions: Intake of fruit and vegetables was generally unrelated to total cancer incidence in this cohort. Residual confounding by smoking is a likely explanation for the observed inverse association with vegetable intake among men.

Received for publication July 21, 2008. Accepted for publication October 14, 2008.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by The American Society for Nutrition