<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org">
<title>American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Bone metabolism</title>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org</link>
<description>American Journal of Clinical Nutrition RSS feed -- recent Bone metabolism articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1938-3207</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>American Journal of Clinical Nutrition</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0002-9165</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/6/1674?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/4/1104?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.ajcn.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>American Journal of Clinical Nutrition</title>
<url>http://www.ajcn.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/6/1674?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Bone metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/6/1674?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> There has been a resurgence of interest in the controversial relation between dietary protein and bone health.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> This article reports on the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between protein and bone health in healthy human adults.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> The MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2007) and EMBASE (1974 to July 2008) databases were electronically searched for all relevant studies of healthy adults; studies of calcium excretion or calcium balance were excluded.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In cross-sectional surveys, all pooled <I>r</I> values for the relation between protein intake and bone mineral density (BMD) or bone mineral content at the main clinically relevant sites were significant and positive; protein intake explained 1&ndash;2% of BMD. A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials indicated a significant positive influence of all protein supplementation on lumbar spine BMD but showed no association with relative risk of hip fractures. No significant effects were identified for soy protein or milk basic protein on lumbar spine BMD.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> A small positive effect of protein supplementation on lumbar spine BMD in randomized placebo-controlled trials supports the positive association between protein intake and bone health found in cross-sectional surveys. However, these results were not supported by cohort study findings for hip fracture risk. Any effects found were small and had 95% CIs that were close to zero. Therefore, there is a small benefit of protein on bone health, but the benefit may not necessarily translate into reduced fracture risk in the long term.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darling, A. L, Millward, D J., Torgerson, D. J, Hewitt, C. E, Lanham-New, S. A]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:02:22 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.2009.27799</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary protein and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Bone metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1692</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1674</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1433?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soy isoflavone supplementation and bone mineral density in menopausal women: a 2-y multicenter clinical trial [Bone metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1433?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Isoflavones are naturally occurring plant estrogens that are abundant in soy. Although purported to protect against bone loss, the efficacy of soy isoflavone supplementation in the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women remains controversial.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> Our aim was to test the effect of soy isoflavone supplementation on bone health.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 24-mo trial was conducted to assess the effects of daily supplementation with 80 or 120 mg of soy hypocotyl aglycone isoflavones plus calcium and vitamin D on bone changes in 403 postmenopausal women. Study subjects were tested annually and changes in whole-body and regional bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and T scores were assessed. Changes in serum biochemical markers of bone metabolism were also assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> After study site, soy intake, and pretreatment values were controlled for, subjects receiving a daily supplement with 120 mg soy isoflavones had a statistically significant smaller reduction in whole-body BMD than did the placebo group both at 1 y (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.03) and at 2 y (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) of treatment. Smaller decreases in whole-body BMD T score were observed among this group of women at 1 y (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.03) but not at 2 y of treatment. When compared with the placebo, soy isoflavone supplementation had no effect on changes in regional BMD, BMC, T scores, or biochemical markers of bone metabolism.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Daily supplementation with 120 mg soy hypocotyl isoflavones reduces whole-body bone loss but does not slow bone loss at common fracture sites in healthy postmenopausal women. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00665860.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, W. W, Lewis, R. D, Steinberg, F. M, Murray, M. J, Cramer, M. A, Amato, P., Young, R. L, Barnes, S., Ellis, K. J, Shypailo, R. J, Fraley, J K., Konzelmann, K. L, Fischer, J. G, Smith, E O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:02:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soy isoflavone supplementation and bone mineral density in menopausal women: a 2-y multicenter clinical trial [Bone metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1439</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1433</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1440?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Low serum folate and vitamin B-6 are associated with an altered cancellous bone structure in humans [Bone metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/5/1440?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Several clinical trials have reported B vitamins to be associated with osteoporosis.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> Our objective was to investigate whether low serum B vitamins are associated with altered structural and biomechanical properties of human bone.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Femoral heads of 94 men and women who underwent hip arthroplasty were analyzed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), biomechanical testing (indentation method), and histomorphometry. In addition, blood was collected to measure serum concentrations of homocysteine, folate, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, the bone formation marker osteocalcin, and the bone resorption marker tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). Measurement outcomes were grouped according to subjects with high and low serum concentrations, respectively, of folate, vitamin B-6, and vitamin B-12 (<I>n</I> = 47 for each group).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Histomorphometric analysis showed a significantly lower trabecular thickness and trabecular area in subjects with low serum folate concentrations than in those with high serum folate concentrations and a significantly lower trabecular number in subjects with low serum vitamin B-6 concentrations than in those with high serum vitamin B-6 concentrations. In contrast, we found a comparable trabecular structure in subjects with high and low serum vitamin B-12 concentrations. DXA and biomechanical testing did not show significant differences between subjects with high and low serum B vitamin concentrations. Osteocalcin was significantly lowered in subjects with a low serum B vitamin concentration, whereas there was no association between serum B vitamins and TRAP.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The results of the present study indicate that low serum folate and vitamin B-6 concentrations, but not low serum vitamin B-12 concentrations, are associated with an altered morphology of human bone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holstein, J. H, Herrmann, M., Splett, C., Herrmann, W., Garcia, P., Histing, T., Graeber, S., Ong, M. F., Kurz, K., Siebel, T., Menger, M. D, Pohlemann, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:02:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Low serum folate and vitamin B-6 are associated with an altered cancellous bone structure in humans [Bone metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1445</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1440</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/4/1104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Overweight children have a greater proportion of fat mass relative to muscle mass in the upper limbs than in the lower limbs: implications for bone strength at the distal forearm [Bone metabolism]]]></title>
<link>http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/short/90/4/1104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The influence of adiposity on upper-limb bone strength has rarely been studied in children, despite the high incidence of forearm fractures in this population.</p>
<p><b>Objective:</b> The objective was to compare the influence of muscle and fat tissues on bone strength between the upper and lower limbs in prepubertal children.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Bone mineral content, total bone cross-sectional area, cortical bone area (CoA), cortical thickness (CoTh) at the radius and tibia (4% and 66%, respectively), trabecular density (TrD), bone strength index (4% sites), cortical density (CoD), stress-strain index, and muscle and fat areas (66% sites) were measured by using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in 427 children (206 boys) aged 7&ndash;10 y.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Overweight children (<I>n</I> = 93) had greater values for bone variables (0.3&ndash;1.3 SD; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001) than did their normal-weight peers, except for CoD 66% and CoTh 4%. The between-group differences were 21&ndash;87% greater at the tibia than at the radius. After adjustment for muscle cross-sectional area, TrD 4%, bone mineral content, CoA, and CoTh 66% at the tibia remained greater in overweight children, whereas at the distal radius total bone cross-sectional area and CoTh were smaller in overweight children (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Overweight children had a greater fat-muscle ratio than did normal-weight children, particularly in the forearm (92 &plusmn; 28% compared with 57 &plusmn; 17%). Fat-muscle ratio correlated negatively with all bone variables, except for TrD and CoD, after adjustment for body weight (<I>r</I> = &ndash;0.17 to &ndash;0.54; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Overweight children had stronger bones than did their normal-weight peers, largely because of greater muscle size. However, the overweight children had a high proportion of fat relative to muscle in the forearm, which is associated with reduced bone strength.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducher, G., Bass, S. L, Naughton, G. A, Eser, P., Telford, R. D, Daly, R. M]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:36:55 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Overweight children have a greater proportion of fat mass relative to muscle mass in the upper limbs than in the lower limbs: implications for bone strength at the distal forearm [Bone metabolism]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1111</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Bone metabolism</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>